结论：MatePad Pro 是一款功能强大的 12 英寸平板电脑华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 是一款注重生产力和娱乐性的现代平板电脑。华为提供的配套键盘盖非常实用。选配的触控笔采用近接技术（NearLink），具有低延迟特性，可检测到超过 16,000 级压力，因此这款平板电脑对创意专业人士特别有吸引力。
Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
显示也非常准确，而且亮度极高。再加上 PaperMatte 表面，使其非常适合移动使用。电池续航时间也凸显了这一点，虽然并不出众，但仍然非常出色，可持续超过 12 小时。虽然 MatePad 的日常性能不错，但与竞争对手相比，麒麟 T92A 的速度稍慢，主要是在大量使用 GPU 时。尽管支持 Wi-Fi 7，但也没有搭载 6 GHz Wi-Fi。
Pros+ 显示屏非常明亮准确
+ 附带键盘
+ 轻巧纤薄
+ 100 瓦快速充电
+ 强大的扬声器
+ 电池寿命长Cons- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网
- 功耗低的 SoC
- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少
价格和供应情况MatePad Pro 12.2（2025）可直接从华为购买，并享受众多折扣；此外，这款平板电脑还可在亚马逊上购买。
$6.47Mr.Shield Screen Protector compatible with Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) [Tempered Glass] [2-PACK] [Japan Glass with 9H Hardness]$16.89WUNIAK Screen Protector for Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2" Tablet, HD Scratch Resistant Tempered Glass Film for Huawei MatePad Pro Drop Protection,Touch Sensitive,Anti-Fingerprint,2 pack.GANGANPRO 1 Pack Compatible with Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 12.2 inch Tempered Glass Screen Protector,Ultra HD,Anti Scratch Case Friendly,Easy Installation
Table of Contents结论：MatePad Pro 是一款功能强大的 12 英寸平板电脑规格华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)外壳、功能和操作 - MatePad Pro 12.2 变得更轻了一些软件与可持续发展 - 华为扩展其更新承诺摄像头 - MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)，配备 5000 万像素传感器显示屏--串联式 OLED 实现超高亮度华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 的其他测量数据Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
华为推出了 2025 版 MatePad Pro 12.2，特别是在性能和摄像头方面进行了升级。这款平板电脑的价格保持稳定，建议零售价（RRP）为 999 欧元，包括键盘盖。
规格华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (MatePad Pro Series)ProcessorHiSilicon Kirin T92 12 x 2.4 GHz, HiSilicon Main, Mid, Kirin T92AGraphics adapterHiSilicon Maleoon 920Memory12 GB Display12.20 inch 13.7:9, 2800 x 1840 pixel 275 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Tandem OLED, PaperMatte Display, glossy: no, HDR, 144 HzStorage512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB , 478.56 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Hall, Gyroscope, Compass, Gravitiy, OTG, NearLinkNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.2, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 271.25 x 182.53Battery39.49 Wh, 5050 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 7.82 V, two cellsChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemHuawei HarmonyOSCameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, AF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, FF); Camera2-API-Level: LimitedSecondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Quad, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Keyboard, Harmony OS 4.3, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, L2HC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1; E5a), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired), fanlessWeight508 g
Price999 EuroLinksHuawei homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳、功能和操作 - MatePad Pro 12.2 变得更轻了一些华为 MatePad Pro 12.2（2025）的厚度仅为 5.5 毫米，依然非常纤薄，比前代产品轻 3 克。 轻 3 克。.华为 MatePad Pro 12.2（2025）的重量为 508 克，相对较轻，拿在手上非常舒适。做工令人印象深刻，无可挑剔。
USB 3.2 还支持有线图像输出、NearLink 和 Wi-Fi 7，设备处于合理水平。遗憾的是，尽管采用了现代无线局域网标准，但仍不支持 6 GHz 无线局域网。集成的四扬声器带来了非常好的声音体验。
电容式触摸屏能快速、准确地响应输入。随附的键盘盖（华为滑动键盘）上有一个手写笔隔层，可将选配的 M-Pencil 安全地存放在这里。触控板和键盘都令人印象深刻。前者具有良好的滑动特性，支持手势操作，工作精确，而键盘的特点是笔触柔和而清晰，启动安静。
在生物识别安全方面，电源按钮集成了指纹传感器，具有可靠的识别率，可快速解锁平板电脑。此外，还支持通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Acer Iconia X12 Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 DIN A4 ❌
软件与可持续发展 - 华为扩展其更新承诺华为没有提供有关可持续发展的具体细节。不过，在测试中发现，MatePad Pro 12.2（2025）的包装几乎完全不含塑料。
更新支持也延长至六年（从上市日期开始）。谷歌应用程序和服务仍未上架，但如果你想使用它们，我们会在文章中提供手动安装说明 在本文中.
摄像头 - MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)，配备 5000 万像素传感器主摄像头的分辨率达到 5000 万像素，大大提高了日常拍摄的质量，非常适合记录。额外的超广角是一个不错的附加功能，但质量明显较差。变焦仅为数字变焦（最多 10 倍），质量参差不齐。
在测试过程中，前置摄像头有明显的红色色调，可以捕捉到更多细节。不过，它足以满足视频通话的需要。
如果要录制视频，主摄像头可提供 30 FPS 的超高清分辨率或 60 FPS 的 1,080p 分辨率。前置摄像头只能拍摄 30 FPS 的全高清视频。
华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)小米红米 Pad 2 4G
4.4 ∆E10.1 ∆E12.3 ∆E6.5 ∆E14.9 ∆E12.1 ∆E10.5 ∆E10.8 ∆E12.5 ∆E8.5 ∆E9 ∆E15.4 ∆E11.1 ∆E4.3 ∆E9.9 ∆E13.6 ∆E13.6 ∆E12.8 ∆E11.6 ∆E9.1 ∆E8.7 ∆E10.7 ∆E8.4 ∆E5.7 ∆EColorChecker Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025: 10.27 ∆E min: 4.35 - max: 15.44 ∆E
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
显示屏--串联式 OLED 实现超高亮度12.2 英寸串联式 OLED 显示屏可提供清晰的视觉效果，而华为 PaperMatte 表面则提供了一种类似纸张的涂层，同时还具有哑光效果。这在户外具有明显的优势。
在纯白色显示屏和环境光传感器激活的情况下，屏幕亮度略高于前代产品。 前代产品.在测试中，华为平板电脑的峰值亮度轻松超过了承诺的 2,000 cd/m²，在缩小白色区域（APL18）和 HDR 播放时均超过了 2,200 cd/m²。
该面板采用高频 PWM 调光，使其相对更容易看清。只有最低亮度还可以再低一些。
1009cd/m²1020cd/m²1032cd/m²1014cd/m²1036cd/m²1042cd/m²1046cd/m²1074cd/m²1075cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1075 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1038.7 cd/m² Minimum: 6.18 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 1036 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.22CCT: 6829 K
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Tandem OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"Acer Iconia X12AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"Apple iPad Air 13 2025IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"Screen-174%-23%-60%Brightness middle (cd/m²)1036378 -64%607 -41%471 -55%Brightness (cd/m²)1039356 -66%576 -45%473 -54%Brightness Distribution (%)9486 -9%87 -7%97 3%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.5Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.47.11 -408%1.52 -9%3.1 -121%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.610.75 -313%3.5 -35%5.8 -123%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.26.3 -186%2.2 -0%2.4 -9%Gamma2.22 99%2.21 100%2.197 100%2.06 107%CCT6829 95%7323 89%6929 94%6746 96%Contrast (:1)1214* ... smaller is better
Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2218 cd/m² Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2327 cd/m²
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 17.97 %Secondary Frequency: 1428 HzThe display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色彩特性：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：正常，色彩气质：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色彩气质：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.719 ms rise↘ 0.6905 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.44 ms rise↘ 0.351 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
户外活动视角华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 的其他测量数据
NetworkingHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
787 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 910) MBit/s ∼92%
Acer Iconia X12802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
332 (min: 264) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 350) MBit/s ∼34%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
941 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 1014) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 974) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
956 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1782 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Tablet iperf3 transmit AXE11000
569 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
634 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1251 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1759 (1709-1788) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1746 (936-1875) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (615-878) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (974-1012) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø998 (910-1022) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø953 (844-986)
Geekbench 6.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench AI | Jetstream 2 Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreApple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2994 Points +97%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points +43%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (1516 - 1574, n=3)
1536 Points +1%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1517 Points Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=101, last 2 years)
1431 Points -6%Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
704 Points -54% Multi-CoreApple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11752 Points +144%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points +47%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (4812 - 5159, n=3)
4968 Points +3%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
4812 Points Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=101, last 2 years)
4592 Points -5%Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1784 Points -63%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points +21%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (13822 - 15804, n=2)
14813 Points +7%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
13822 Points Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=84, last 2 years)
12141 Points -12%Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9192 Points -33%3DMark
Wild Life ScoreAverage HiSilicon Kirin T92 (5123 - 7134, n=3)
6012 Points +4%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
5779 Points Average of class Tablet (374 - 7134, n=62, last 2 years)
1864 Points -68%Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1170 Points -80% Wild Life Unlimited ScoreSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
18352 Points +219%Average of class Tablet (368 - 32525, n=92, last 2 years)
7277 Points +27%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (5079 - 7178, n=3)
6002 Points +4%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
5750 Points Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1201 Points -79% Wild Life ExtremeApple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
7031 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5236 Points Average of class Tablet (85 - 9391, n=95, last 2 years)
2350 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (1459 - 1796, n=2)
1628 Points Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
336 Points Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5289 Points Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
5145 Points Average of class Tablet (99 - 11105, n=94, last 2 years)
2513 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (1427 - 1757, n=2)
1592 Points Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
331 Points GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
91 fps +203%Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
60 fps +100%Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 122, n=99, last 2 years)
38.5 fps +28%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (30 - 37, n=3)
33 fps +10%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
30 fps Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.5 fps -72%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenApple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
205 fps +181%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
176 fps +141%Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 340, n=99, last 2 years)
93.2 fps +28%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (73 - 94, n=3)
81 fps +11%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
73 fps Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
16 fps -78%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
67 fps +253%Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
51 fps +168%Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 106.4, n=99, last 2 years)
27.6 fps +45%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (19 - 23, n=3)
20.3 fps +7%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
19 fps Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.4 fps -72%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
72 fps +167%Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
71 fps +163%Average of class Tablet (1.5 - 125, n=99, last 2 years)
35.6 fps +32%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (27 - 35, n=3)
29.7 fps +10%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
27 fps Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.8 fps -79%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288 (vulkan)
35 fps +192%Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
32 fps +167%Average of class Tablet (0.64 - 55.1, n=99, last 2 years)
16.3 fps +36%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (12 - 15, n=3)
13 fps +8%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
12 fps Acer Iconia X12Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.5 fps -79%Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=15, last 2 years)
417 Points +8%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (386 - 402, n=2)
394 Points +2%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
386 Points Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=15, last 2 years)
854 Points +121%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (387 - 404, n=2)
396 Points +2%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
387 Points Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=15, last 2 years)
1159 Points +45%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (801 - 831, n=2)
816 Points +2%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
801 Points Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192 (Safari 18)
307.6 Points +58%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288 (Chrome 137, Performance Mode)
194.54 Points Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288 (Chrome 137)
129.817 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288 (Chrome 130)
177.483 Points -9%Average HiSilicon Kirin T92 (129.8 - 194.5, n=4)
173.7 Points -11%Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=71, last 2 years)
146.1 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5-22%-29%-39% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)2110.353574.3 69%1867 ?(1023 - 2110, n=34) -12%1663 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years) -21% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)1988.5554.67 -72%1303 ?(575 - 1989, n=34) -34%1216 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years) -39% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)340.83218.43 -36%288 ?(208 - 386, n=34) -16%236 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years) -31% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)745.32374.09 -50%354 ?(64.8 - 745, n=34) -53%268 ?(9.1 - 989, n=89, last 2 years) -64%
Max. LoadIdle
36.5 °C37.1 °C31 °C 33.4 °C34.1 °C29.9 °C 30.2 °C30.6 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °CAverage: 32.7 °C
32 °C35.6 °C38.5 °C30.2 °C33.9 °C33.7 °C30.1 °C30.6 °C31.5 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °CAverage: 32.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 32.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
28.5 °C28.6 °C27.2 °C 27.2 °C27.7 °C28.3 °C 27.5 °C28.5 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °CAverage: 28.2 °C
26.1 °C27.4 °C27.8 °C26.7 °C27.1 °C27.1 °C27.8 °C27.3 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 27.8 °CAverage: 27.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityAcer Iconia X12Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 % -36% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityAcer Iconia X12Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % Apple iPad Air 13 2025M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 % -6%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø30.5 (30.4-30.6) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.9 (58.9-93.1) Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.73 (2.72-2.74) Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.17 (8.34-13.5)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
12h 23min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 20255050 mAh
12.4 h Acer Iconia X1210000 mAh
13.9 h Apple iPad Air 13 2025 mAh
13.2 h Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+10090 mAh
8.4 h
Notebookcheck 总体评分华为 MatePad Pro 12.2（2025）拥有六年更新保证、画质稳定的 5000 万像素主摄像头和足以满足视频通话需求的前置摄像头，给人留下了深刻印象。亮丽的 12.2 英寸串联式 OLED 显示屏亮度超过 2,200 cd/m²，表面采用磨砂处理，并通过高频 PWM 调光技术使显示效果更加清晰。
Back to the verdict
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
- 07/15/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device94%
Connectivity60 / 69 → 86%
Weight83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery89%
Display94%
Games Performance26 / 65 → 40%
Application Performance67 / 92 → 73%
AI Performance25%
Temperature93%
Noise100%
Audio90 / 91 → 99%
Camera61 / 90 → 68%
Average70%
85%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials50%Packaging85%Power Use92.4%Repairability40%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 61.2%
可能的替代品比较
Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!
More articles related to this deviceHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (MatePad Pro Series)News•华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) 的评价：稳健的平板电脑，略有瑕疵 |News•华为 MatePad Pro 12.2：比 iPad Air 便宜得多，但不一定更好 |News•华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 评测结论：比 iPad Pro 便宜得多，部分性能更胜一筹 |Review•采用纳米纹理玻璃显示屏的顶级平板电脑 - 华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 PaperMatte (2025) 评测 |News•华为将于下周在全球发布新一代可折叠智能手机：Mate X6 还是 Mate XT 极致设计？ |Review•华为 MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) 评测--配备磨砂显示屏和强大功能的 12.2 英寸平板电脑 |Review•华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 评测--配备高精度手写笔的创意平板电脑
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 649191 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!